Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Delight of Duty


The nature and depth of human pride are illuminated by comparing boasting to self- pity. Both are manifestations of pride. Boasting is the response of pride to success. Self-pity is the response of pride to suffering. Boasting says,"I deserve admiration because I have achieved so much." Self-pity says,"I deserve admiration because I have suffered so much." Boasting is the voice of pride in the heart of the strong. Self-pity is the voice of pride in the weak. Boasting sounds self sufficient and self-pity sounds self sacrificing. Self-pity doesn't come from a sense of unworthiness but from a sense of unrecognized worthiness. It is the response to unapplauded pride.
When suffering is accepted for the sake of joy there will be no self-pity. Matthew5:11-12

God hates pride.

I read this in a small book written by John Piper on delighting in the Lord. The title of the book is : The Dangerous Duty of Delight. Alot of people do not like that word duty when associated with our christian walk. As if to say that they are always delighted to do what is asked of them. As if they never struggle the way that Paul struggled in Romans and the way that all Christians will struggle at times. Actually, I say "asked of them" but the truth is, we are commanded to do things. We are commanded to feel things. That's another word that isn't liked by some. Jesus says in Luke17:10 "So, likewise, when you have done all those things which you are commanded say, "we are unprofitable servants. We have done what was our duty to do".
Boy, that would make some people mad if Christ had not been the one to say it! I can hear it now, "why do you act as if we are commanded to do things, we should just want to do them!" Why do you say its your duty? Do you not love Christ! You shouldn't say you have a duty but a joyous desire!" As if the joy they have in serving the Lord has been mustered up in their own strength. As if all things they have received has not been given to them. Boasting in the love they have. Pride.

The truth is that we are commanded and we have a duty and we are commanded to delight in that duty. "Rejoice in the Lord always".... So what does this mean if the cheerfulness is not there? Does this mean you aren't saved? Does it mean that you have no love? NO! Confess the sin of joylessness...Psalm 61:2 my heart is faint; lead me to the rock that is higher than I"...pray that God would restore the joy of obedience...Psalm40:8, I delight to do Your will, O my God; Your law is within my heart and get on with doing your duty in the hope that the Lord will restore your delight.

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Who can respond?


Below is a link to an article at Lou Martuneac's Blog, "In defense Of The Gospel". The article is written by Dr. Charlie Bing of grace Life ministries. I have responded to several comments in Bing's article.

http://indefenseofthegospel.blogspot.com/2010/02/can-unregenerate-person-believe-gospel.html

Dr.Bing,
The issue of total depravity
Total depravity is a theological term used by
some to describe the sinfulness of man. The term itself is not in the Bible
.
Neither is the term "free will". That is a theological construct derived from ones interpretation of scripture.

Dr. Bing,
Those who insist that God must regenerate a person before that person can believe define total depravity as man’s total inability to respond positively to God. They believe that an unregenerate person cannot even understand and believe the gospel. This view is held by Reformed theology and strong versions of Calvinism.

The doctrine of depravity is this: man is totally unable to contribute to his own salvation in any way, because he is dead in his sins. For example, the resurrection of Lazarus was not a joint effort between Christ and Lazarus. Lazarus came forth because he was raised, not in order to be raised.

Dr. Bing,
They believe that an unregenerate person cannot even understand and believe the gospel.

Well what does scripture say?
1 Cor. 2:14-the natural man does not receive the things of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, nor can he understand them because they are spiritually appraised.
2 Cor. 4:3-4, 1Cor. 1:18,21-24, Deuteronomy 29:2-4, Matthew 11:27 just to site a few.
True enough man can respond, but only in rebellion.

Dr. Bing,
Though sin’s corruption extends to every man and all of his being, man retains the capacity to respond to God’s initiative. Even after Adam sinned and died spiritually, he was able to talk with God immediately

Scripture states that man has not the capacity to respond to God's initiative on his own. Unregenerate man is "enslaved" to sin. See verses above as well as: John 8:34, 2 Peter 2:19, Titus 3:3, Galatians 4:8-9, Romans 66, 16, 17, 19-20, Romans 7:14, 2 Timothy 2:25-26, When God came to Adam after the fall God sought Adam and he hid himself, so it goes for man today. Genesis 3:8-9. Again unregenerate man's response is only rebellion to the things of God.

Dr. Bing,
After Adam’s fall in Genesis 3, man is considered “dead in trespasses and sins” as described in Ephesians 2:1 (see also Rom. 3:10-18; 5:12; 1 Cor. 15:22). How one understands this spiritual death determines how one relates faith to regeneration.

Bing is right man is "dead". He even admits that man is spiritually dead. So, then what can a "dead" man do? Nothing! He is unable to respond to anything spiritual.

So the condition of man before regeneration is best described in biblical description, such as Ezek. 37:3-5 when the Lord showed the prophet Ezekiel the valley of dry bones, He said,
Son of Man, can these bones live? And I answered, O Lord God, you know. Again He said to me, Prophesy over these bones, hear the Lord God to these bones, Behold, I will cause breath to enter you that you may come to life
Before regeneration we are nothing but dry bones. Unregenerate man is not sick or ailing he is "dead". Not because I say so but scripture says so. Now to say that he is dead in this respect does not suggest that one is physically dead, or dead in every aspect of his being. It simply means as Bing states he is dead spiritually. He has no ability within himself to link up with the Holy Spirit, which can only come as a gift of God. because he is dead he must be born again. John 3:5-7 Even further, he cannot submit to his laws (Rom 8:7-8). The natural man is incapable of understanding spiritual things, and since the gospel is in the front rank of spiritual things which require spiritual understanding, this means the natural man has no ability to comprehend the gospel (1 Cor. 2:14). This means that a Biblical evangelist is preaching in a graveyard!

Dr. Bing,
Self-determination, even if used to reject God, is essential to humanness and person hood.

Bings use of the phrase "self determination" is a poor choice of words to describe man's decision making process. The more biblical terminology to describe what lies at the root of mans decision making is the "heart and mind".

Titus 1:15-16 to the defiled and unbelieving, nothing is pure, but both their minds and their consciences are defiled
Proverbs 10:20
Jeremiah 17:9 The heart is more deceitful above all else and is desperately sick, who can understand it

Dr. Bing,
Without self-determination man would be nothing more than a robot with every decision and action determined and controlled by God.

Scripture is replete with instances of God exerting his divine power, restricting man's freedom, and preventing him from doing that which he would have otherwise done. All without destroying mans responsibility.
Genesis 20:6- Then God said to him in a dream, "yes, I know that in the integrity of your heart you have done this, and I also kept you from sinning against me; therefore I did not let you touch her.
Jeremiah 18:4-6, Proverbs 21:1, Isaiah 45:9,
As A.W. Pink rightly states: The reply that someone says, God could not without interfering with man's freedom thus reducing him to a machine. But the case of Abimelech proves conclusively that such a reply is untenable and erroneous- we might add wicked and blasphemous, for who are we to limit the Most High!! How dare any finite creature take it upon himself to say what the All mighty can and cannot do!

Dr. Bing,
God would not be just or fair if He condemned people who could not believe because He did not regenerate them

What does this say about the severely retarded individual who cannot respond to the Gospel?

Dr. Bing,
That would actually make God the author of evil.

What does Bing mean by author? Plainly it was God's will/plan for sin and evil to enter into the world or it would not have entered. Nothing happens outside of God's sovereign decree's
. Lamentations 3:37- "Who can speak and have it happen if the Lord has not decreed it"
Job 42:2, Psalm 115:3, Isaiah 14:27, Isaiah 43:13, Isaiah 46:10, Daniel 4:35 all these verses show that it is God who is in control not man.

Dr. Bing,
God’s invitation to be saved through the gospel is a sincere and legitimate offer only if any and every person can believe it

The fact that a mentally incapable person cannot respond does that make the Gospel illegitimate? See earlier post on this issue. Not a very well thought out statement.

Dr. Bing,
the gospel is for all (John 3:16; 2 Cor. 5:19-20; 1 Tim. 2:3-6; 1 John 2:2). Just as Paul preached everywhere with the assumption that anyone could respond to the gospel (Acts 20:21), we also should share the gospel with everyone (Matt. 28:18-20; Mark 16:15; Acts 1:8) because it is a genuine offer to everyone.
Finally, something we can agree on!

I think these statements by Doug Wilson helps show the remainder of the errors in Bing's article.

What Denial Involves
The denial of man's total inability will ultimately undermine our faith in the necessity of the new birth and the evangelical proclamation. How so?
Scripture teaches us that faith is pleasing to God. It also teaches us that we are to live our Christian lives the same way we began our Christian lives (Gal. 3:1-6; Col. 2:6). Now if unregenerate men, on their own, are capable of saving faith, without having been regenerated by the Spirit of God, then they should be able to continue to exercise that same kind of faith, after they are saved, without any help from the Spirit of God.

If a man can become a believer on his own, then he can continue to believe on his own. And if he can continue to believe on his own, then what did regeneration accomplish? The Bible teaches us that the Christian life begins with faith, continues in faith, and concludes in faith (Romans 1:17). The foundation of all godliness is faith, and a denial of man's total inability means that unbelievers are capable of laying that foundation for all godliness on their own. Even if one argues that the Holy Spirit regenerates a man after he believes, such a regeneration is superfluous. What is it for? What does it do? In this view, it most certainly does not enable the man to believe or trust God. It hardly does honor to the resurrecting Spirit to say that His job is to tag along.

The apostle Paul rebuked the Galatians when they forgot that they began by hearing with faith and then sought to finish the job by human effort. In considering his response to that error, I doubt he would have thought much of the confusion that reverses the order -- beginning by human effort and then finishing by the Spirit.

Put bluntly, it amounts to this: If I am saved, sanctified, and glorified through faith (which the Bible teaches), and faith is possible apart from regeneration (which a denial of total inability asserts), then salvation, sanctification, and glorification are possible without regeneration. And that reasoning undermines the necessity of the everlasting and eternal gospel.

Carts and Horses
God gives eyes, and then we see. God gives life, and then we live. For it is the God who commanded light to shine out of darkness, who has shone in our hearts to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ (II Cor. 4:6).
Contrast this Biblical way of thinking with the alternative. I saw, and so God gave me eyes. I came alive, and so God gave me a resurrection. Light came forth from my heart, so God said, "Let there be light." This is obviously incorrect; it is God, Paul says, who commanded light to come out of darkness. It is God who commanded that it shine in our hearts.

Notice the comparison in this passage between the gift of new life and the creation of the material universe. It bears mentioning that the material creation was ex nihilo -- from nothing. Paul asserts the same about the new creation; it too is from nothing.

The creation does not help the Creator out in the work of creation; the Creator acts unilaterally. The dilemma for evangelicals who want to deny total inability is this: either God must begin the resurrecting work of salvation because unsaved men are dead, or unsaved men are capable of beginning the process of their salvation on their own by means of saving faith. If the former, then we say welcome and shake hands. If the latter, then it follows that unsaved men can finish what they began, and we are confronted with a false gospel. In other words, there is no consistent stopping place between Reformed theology on the one hand, and a Pelagian theology on the other. Of course, plenty of evangelicals do not wind up in one camp or the other, but that is to be considered a triumph of inconsistency.

Conclusion
The Bible does not permit us to boast in our salvation at all: "You are in Christ Jesus, who became for us wisdom from God -- and righteousness and sanctification and redemption -- that, as it is written, `He who glories, let him glory in the Lord'" (I Corinthians 1:30-31).
If a man has been raised from the dead, there is much cause for rejoicing; there is is no land in sight.
No cause for pride. And when all human boasting is removed, what remains? Nothing of ours, but there is an infinite ocean of grace.

Tuesday, February 9, 2010

Love


Love suffers long and is kind; love does not envy; love does not parade itself, is not puffed up; does not behave rudely; does not seek its own, is not provoked, thinks no evil; does not rejoice in iniquity, but rejoices in truth; bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things. Love never fails....1 Cor 13:4-8a....

This passage of scripture has been heavy on my mind lately. Surely because I need to be reminded of these truths often but it seems as if it is more than that. As I have been studying the word, I am confronted with the fact that I can read the same verse as another yet we conclude two very different things. This is true on so many issues: Lordship/Free Grace, Calvinism/Arminians, Total Depravity/?almost depraved (not sure of the label there), bondage of the will/freedom of the will...and while all of things are important and deserve to be prayerfully studied there is something to be said about studying Love....the Love that saved us, the Love that caused our hearts repentance, the love that we are given and the love we are told to give to God and others. We need to know what this love looks like if we are to walk in it. First and foremost it is given to us by the Holy Spirit Himself. He has given us the grace to do what He has called us to do. There is just no way to love anyone the way that this passage describes apart from Jesus. (The name above all names) The same God that created this world, raised Jesus from the dead, and saved a wretch like me, is the same God that enables me to pursue and desire the love He gives.

1. love suffers long and is kind: how long before I am unkind to my children during school? how long before the snippy remark is made to someone that may disagree on the blog? how long before our co worker gets a taste of that suffering long?

2. love does not envy and does not parade itself: what about when the brethren prosper yet I do not? how many of us truly want to be unknown and never commended, never spoken highly of? who of us has not paraded ourselves in some area? our knowledge, our gifts, our love? (look at me how loving I am, look at how much I love God? really?)

This is just enough to keep me on my knees daily in prayer for God to grow my love!

3. does not behave rudely? surely we need zero help here to recognize this in our own life....does not seek its own, is not provoked? of course we all seek our own when we aren't walking in love, when we are seeking the best for our brother we do not do the things listed above, we wouldn't taste the anger of being put out by not being obeyed or not getting our own way or whatever our particular thing may be.

4.thinks no evil, does not rejoice in iniquity: that can be as simple as placing sin before our eyes in the form of entertainment and being happy that we are being entertained by sin....we are not to rejoice in sin and we are to think upon evil...whatever things are lovely, pure, noble...these things we are to think on..and dare we call something that is clear sin LOVE? we cannot clean up iniquity by calling it by another name (addiction, an affair, just playing, etc )

5.bears all things, believes all things, hopes all things, endures all things: YES! this is what love is...this is what Christ does for us! He bears all things, He was the bearer of our very iniquity...we are forgiven all things thru Christ..can we not forgive? can we not love others with the love we receive? can we not endure and have hope in all situations? These verses are not just for us in dealing with our family or our brothers....we are to love those who hate us. As God first loved us when we were haters of Him.

6. Love never fails: before we say whatever we are thinking, do we think of this love? before we post that comment that we feel justified in posting, do we think of this love? before we excuse sin in our life or in the life of those around us, do we think of this love? before we blog away, study away, talk away, advise away, serve away, work away do we think of this love?

We need You Jesus to work in our life, in our mind and in our hearts that we may walk in this love......

How great the Fathers love for us? It never fails.........

Saturday, February 6, 2010

The First Temptation


The First Temptation
Genesis 3

J. R. Miller


The story of the first temptation is intensely interesting. We do not need to perplex ourselves with its form. There is enough in it that is plain and simple and of practical value, and we should not let our minds be confused by its mystery. Whatever the broader meaning of this first temptation may have been, everyone must meet a like personal experience, and hence this Genesis story has for us a most vital interest.

Everyone must be tempted. Untried life is not yet established. We must be tested and proved. It is the man who endures temptation, who is blessed. Our first parents did not endure.

It was in the garden of Eden, with beauty and happiness on every side. But even into this lovely home, came the tempter! He came stealthily. The serpent is a remarkable illustration of temptation: subtle, fascinating, approaching noiselessly and with an appearance of harmlessness which throws us off our guard.

The tempter began his temptation in a way which gave no alarm to the woman. He asked her, "Has God said—You shall not eat of any tree of the garden?" The question indicated surprise that God should make such a prohibition. The tempter's wish was, in a quiet and insinuating way, to impeach the goodness of God and make Eve think of Him as severe and harsh. His purpose was to put doubt of God's goodness into the woman's mind. "If God loved you—would He deny you anything so good?"

The tempter still practices the same deep cunning. He wants to make people think that God is severe, that His restraints are unreasonable. He tries to make the young man think that his father is too stern with him; the young girl that her mother is too rigid. He seeks to get people to think themselves oppressed by the Divine requirements. That is usually the first step in temptation, and when one has begun to think of God as too exacting, he is ready for the next downward step.

Everything depends upon the way a person meets temptation. Parleying is always unsafe. Eve's first mistake was in answering the tempter at all. She ought to have turned instantly away, refusing to listen. When there comes to us a wrong suggestion of any kind, the only wise and safe thing for us—is immediately to shut the door of our heart in its face. To dally is usually to be lost. Our decision should be instant and absolute, when temptation offers. The poet gave a fine test of character when he said he would not take for a friend, the man who needlessly sets his foot upon a worm. With still greater positiveness should we refuse to accept as a friend, one who seeks to throw doubt on God's goodness and love.

When the tempter finds a ready ear for his first approach—he is encouraged to go on. In this case, having raised suspicion of the Divine goodness, he went on to question God's veracity. "The serpent said unto the woman—You shall not surely die!" He would not have said this at the first, for the woman would not have listened then to such an accusation against God. But one doubt makes way for another. She listened now, and was not shocked when the tempter went farther and charged God with insincerity.

The tempter still follows the same course with those he would draw away from God. He tells them that what God says about the consequences of disobedience is not true. He tries to make people believe that the soul that sins—shall not die. He is still going about casting doubt upon God's words and suggesting changes in the reading of the Bible. He even tried to tempt our Savior by misquoting and perverting Scripture! He sought to get Him to trust a Divine promise—when He had no Divine command to do the thing suggested. We need to be sure of the character of the people we admit into our lives as friends, advisers, or teachers. Jesus tells us that His sheep know His voice. They know the voice of strangers, too, and will not listen to them, because they will not trust the words of strangers.

The tempter now goes a step farther with the woman. "God does know that in the day you eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and you shall be as God, knowing good and evil." Instead of dying, as God had said they should, if they ate the forbidden fruit—the devil said the eating of this fruit would open their eyes and make them wondrously wise, even something like God Himself!

The tempter talks in just the same way in these modern days. He tells the boys and young men, that doing certain things will make them smart and happy. He taunts them also with the ignorance of simple innocence, and suggests to them that they ought to see and experience the world. It will make men of them and give them power, influence and happiness. There is a great deal of this sort of temptation. A good many people cannot stand the taunt of being 'religious' or of being afraid to do certain things.

The temptation was successful. "When the woman saw that the fruit of the tree was good for food and pleasing to the eye, and also desirable for gaining wisdom, she took some and ate it." She listened to the cunning words of the tempter. Curiosity, ambition, and desire—all awoke in her. The one prohibited thing in the garden, began to shine in such alluring colors that she forgot all the good things which were permitted to her. It all seemed dull and poor, compared with the imagined sweetness of the fruit they were not allowed to eat. The commandment of God faded out of her mind—as she stood listening to the tempter and looking at the forbidden fruit before her. Then, fatal moment! She reached out her hand and took the fruit—and the doleful deed was done! We never know what a floodgate of evil and sorrow—one little thought or word or act may open—what a river of harm and ruin may flow from it!

When one has yielded to temptation, the next step ofttimes is the tempting of others. "She also gave some to her husband, who was with her, and he ate it!" Milton suggests that it was because of his love for Eve that Adam accepted the fruit from her hand. Since she had fallen, he wished to perish with her. Whatever the reason was for Adam's yielding, we know that the common story is—the tempted and fallen—become tempters of others! The corrupted become corrupters of others. One of the blessings of companionship should be mutual help. Mountain climbers tie themselves together with ropes that the one may support the other. But sometimes one slips and drags the other with him down to death. Companionship may bring ruin, instead of blessing!

However pleasant sin may be, when it has been committed, a dark shadow falls over the soul. "The man and his wife hid themselves from the presence of the Lord God among the trees." The first thing after sinning is remorse, and then comes the desire to hide from God!

There is a story of a young man who entered the house of one who had been his friend, to steal costly jewels which he knew to be in a certain place. He made his way quietly into the room, found the trunk in which the jewels were kept, and opened it. Then glancing up he saw a portrait hanging on the wall—the face of one he had known in years gone, in this house—but who was now dead. The calm, deep eyes of his old companion looking down upon him, witnessing his dark deed, made him tremble. He tried to keep his back to the picture—but he could not hold his gaze away from it. Yet he could not go on with his robbery. The steady looking of the eyes down upon him, maddened him. At length he took a knife and cut the eyes from the portrait and then finished his crime. If even human eyes looking down upon us make it impossible for us to commit sins—how much more terrible is the eye of God to the guilty soul!

But it is impossible ever to get away from the presence of God. While the man and his wife were thus trying to hide, they heard God's voice saying, "Where are you?" It was not in anger but in love, that the Father thus followed His erring children. He sought them—that He might save them. It is ever so. God is not to be dreaded—even if we have done wrong. We never should flee from Him. He follows us—but it is that He may find us and save us. Conscience is not an enemy, but a friend—the voice of God speaking in love. People sometimes wish they could get away altogether from God, could silence His voice; but if this were possible, it would be unto the darkness of hopeless ruin!

It is pitiful to read in the narrative how, when asked regarding their sin, the man sought to put the blame on the woman. "The woman You put here with me—she gave me some fruit from the tree, and I ate it." That is the way ofttimes—when a man has done wrong, he blames somebody else. A drunkard said it was his wife's fault, for she was not sociable at home and he went out evenings to find somebody to talk with. A young man fell into sin—and said it was the fault of his companion who had tempted him. No doubt a share of guilt lies on the tempter of innocence and inexperience. It is a fearful thing to influence another to do wrong. Yet temptation does not excuse sin. We should learn that no sin of others in tempting us—will ever excuse our sin in yielding. No one can compel us to do wrong. Our sin is always our own!

At once upon the dark cloud—breaks the light! No sooner had man fallen, than God's thought of redemption appears. "So the LORD God said to the serpent—I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; He will crush your head, and you will strike his heel." This fifteenth verse is the gospel, the first promise of a Savior. It is very dim and indistinct, a mere glimmering of light, on the edge of the darkness. But it was a gospel of hope to our first parents, in their sorrow and shame. We understand now its full meaning. It is a star-word as it shines here. A star is but a dim point of light as we see it in the heavens—but we understand that it is really a vast world, or center of a system of worlds. This promise holds in obscure dimness—all the glory of all the after-revealings of the Messiah. As we read on in the Old Testament, we continually find new unfoldings, fuller revelations, until at length we have the promise fulfilled in the coming of Jesus Christ!

This story of the first temptation and fall, is not the record of one isolated failure at the beginning of the world's history merely—it is a record which may be written into every human biography. It tells us of the fearful danger of sin, and then of sin's dreadful cost. What a joy it is that on the edge of this story of falling—we have the promise of one who would overcome! Now we have the story of one who has overcome, "strong Son of God," who also was tempted—but who did not yield, and now is the Mighty Deliverer. He overcame the world. And in Him we have peace and salvation!

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Believing is the evidence of the new birth

Modern Day Sacerdotalism?


Sacerdotalism: The term refers to the doctrine that the man who ministers in sacred things, the institution through which he ministers, the acts he performs, the sacraments and rights he celebrates, are so ordained and constituted of God as to be the peculiar channels of His grace, essential to true worship necessary to the being of religion and the full realization of religious life.

As I was studying the doctrine held by the Church of Christ, (Campbellites) that baptism being "necessary" for salvation. I have viewed and read some debates between the CoC and the orthodox view of faith alone. I have personally had conversation with someone who was an ex CoC minister who was trained to debate Baptist, Presbyterians, Calvinist, etc. These CoC guys really took their opponents to task. They believe that one must be baptized by someone in the CoC and into the CoC religious organization. If not done in this prescribed way, you are damned. Their doctrinal stance on baptism is similar in nature to the heretical views of the Catholic church. One error being the practice of sacerdotalism. Orthodox protestants are not immune to such practices as this article below would indicate. Although maybe not salvific in nature, error none the less.


Protestant Sacerdotalism

The following statement is taken from Dr. Torrance's brilliant essay on "Justification," which was printed in Christianity Divided.

Nowhere does Justification by Christ alone have more radical consequences than in regard to the pastoral ministry. Justification by Christ is grounded upon His mighty Act in which He took our place, substituting Himself for us under the divine judgment, and substituting Himself for us in the obedient response He rendered to God in worship and thanksgiving and praise. In Himself He has opened up a way to the Father, so that we may approach God solely through Him and on the ground of what He has done and is — therefore we pray in His Name, and whatever we do, we do in His Name before God. Thus the whole of our worship and ministry reposes upon the substitutionary work of Christ. Now the radical nature of this is apparent from the fact that through substituting Himself in our place there takes place a displacement of our humanity by the humanity of Christ — that is why Jesus insists that we can only follow Him by denying ourselves, by letting Him displace us from a place of centrality, and by letting Him take our place.

At the Reformation this doctrine had immediate effect in the overthrow of Roman sacerdotalism — Jesus Christ is our sole Priest. He is the one and only Man who can mediate between us and God, so that we approach God solely through the mediation of the Humanity of Jesus, through His incarnate Priesthood. When the Humanity of Christ is depreciated or whenever it is obscured by the sheer majesty of His Deity, then the need for some other human mediation creeps in — hence in the Dark and Middle Ages arose the need for a human priesthood to mediate between sinful humanity and the exalted Christ, the majestic Judge and King. There was of course no denial of the Deity of Christ by the Reformers — on the contrary, they restored the purity of faith in Christ as God through overthrowing the accretions that compromised it; but they also restored the place occupied in the New Testament and the Early Church by the Humanity of Christ, as He who took our human nature in order to be our Priest, as He who takes our side and is our Advocate before the judgment of God, and who once and for all has wrought out atonement for us in His sacrifice on the Cross, and therefore as He who eternally stands in for us as our heavenly Mediator and High Priest.

The Church on earth lives and acts only as it is directed by its heavenly Lord, and only in such a way that His Ministry is reflected in the midst of its ministry and worship. Therefore from first to last the worship and ministry of the Church on earth must be governed by the fact that Christ substitutes Himself in our place, and that our humanity with its own acts of worship, is displaced by His, so that we appear before God not in our own name, not in our own significance, not in virtue of our own acts of confession, contrition, worship, and thanksgiving, but solely in the name of Christ and solely in virtue of what He has done in our name and on our behalf, and in our stead. Justification by Christ alone means that from first to last in the worship of God and in the ministry of the Gospel Christ Himself is central, and that we draw near in worship and service only through letting Him take our place. He only is Priest. He only represents humanity. He only has an offering with which to appear before God and with which God is well pleased. He only presents our prayers before God, and He only is our praise and thanksgiving and worship as we appear before the face of the Father. Nothing in our hands we bring—simply to His Cross we cling.

But what has happened in Protestant worship and ministry? Is it not too often the case that the whole life and worship of the congregation revolves round the personality of the minister? He is the one who is in the center; he offers the prayers of the congregation; he it is who mediates "truth" through his personality, and he it is who mediates between the people and God through conducting the worship entirely on his own. Nowhere is this more apparent than in the case of the popular minister where everything centers on him, and the whole life of the congregation is built round him. What is that but Protestant sacerdotalism, sacerdotalism which involves the displacement of the Humanity of Christ by the humanity of the minister, and the obscuring of the Person of Christ by the personality of the minister? How extraordinary that Protestantism should thus develop a new sacerdotalism, to be sure a psychological rather than a sacramental sacerdotalism, but a sacerdotalism nonetheless, in which it is the personality of the minister which both mediates the Word of God to man and mediates the worship of man to God! Protestant Churches are full of these "psychological priests" and more and more they evolve a psychological cult and develop a form of psychological counseling which displaces the truly pastoral ministry of Christ. How frequently, for example, the minister's prayers are so crammed with his own personality (with all its boring idiosyncrasies!) that the worshipper cannot get past him in order to worship God in the name of Christ — but is forced to worship God in the name of the minister! How frequently the sermon is not an exposition of the Word of God but an exposition of the minister's own views on this or that subject! And how frequently the whole life of the congregation is so built up on the personality of the minister that when he goes the congregation all but collapses or dwindles away!

There can be no doubt that the whole concept of the ministry and of worship in our Reformed Churches needs to be brought back to the criticism of the Word of God in order that we may learn again the meaning of Justification by Christ alone in the midst of the Church's life and work. Jesus Christ must be given His rightful place by being set right in the center, as Head and Lord of the Church, as its sole Prophet and Priest and King, and that means in the midst of our preaching, in the basic notion of the ministerial office, in the fundamental mode of worship, and in the whole life of the congregation as the Body of Christ alone.


Nolan