Sunday, December 15, 2013

What is your only comfort in life and in death?


Great question. I would like to focus on this thought by letting a book that is 450 years old guide us through God’s word. It’s called the Heidelberg Catechism.  It was written in 1563, after much study and prayer by a preacher and theologian named Zacharias Urinus and several of his friends in the southern German city of Heidelberg.   A catechism is simply a teaching tool that uses a question and answer format to share knowledge and truth. A catechism is not the Holy Bible nor is it a replacement for scripture and should only be used to help us dive deeper into the Word of God never to draw us further away from it.  That is why what I want to do tonight is to look at the first question asked by this Catechism and use various scripture to verify it.  The question is this: 
Question: What is your only comfort in life and death?
Answer: That I am not my own, but belong—body and soul, in life and in death—to my faithful Savior, Jesus Christ. He has fully paid for all my sins with his precious blood, and has set me free from the tyranny of the devil. He also watches over me in such a way that not a hair can fall from my head without the will of my Father in heaven; in fact, all things must work together for my salvation. Because I belong to him, Christ, by his Holy Spirit, assures me of eternal life and makes me wholeheartedly willing and ready from now on to live for him.1 
Before we dig into this let me say that the question that they are asking is not what makes you comfortable like a big lay-z-boy chair or something like that.  A better translation of this (remember it was originally in German….from the word “trost”) is where is your only ‘trust’.  It is no accident that Mr. Urinus and his friends thought this should be the first of a 129-question catechism.  In his own commentary on the catechism, Urinus says, “The question of comfort (or trust) is placed, and treated first, because it embodies the design and substance of the catechism.”  He goes on to say later that the design is to lead believers to sure and solid comfort (trust) in any circumstance we find ourselves in.  The substance of this trust is this, “that we are ingrafted into Christ by faith, that through him we are reconciled to, and beloved of God, that thus he may care for and save us eternally.”  I love this because it focuses not on what we must do but on what has already been done in Christ for his glory and our good.  Grace.  The amazing grace fact is that, if we believe in Jesus, we belong to Christ and in his pierced hands we are sufficiently, eternally, and fully cared for.  We are safe.  Safer than any other place we could be.  We are saved and he will see us through until the end. 
One of the great things about catechisms is the fact they list the scripture from which they draw their answers.  So, let’s dissect this and examine the scripture that led them to this conclusion. 
The first part of the answer says, “That I am not my own”
This comes from 1 Corinthians 6:19-20 which states:

19 What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own?
20 For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which are God's.
 “but belong body and soul, in life and in death” comes from Romans 14:7-9
For none of us liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself.
For whether we live, we live unto the Lord; and whether we die, we die unto the Lord: whether we live therefore, or die, we are the Lord's.
For to this end Christ both died, and rose, and revived, that he might be Lord both of the dead and living.
“to my faithful Savior, Jesus Christ.” This is from 1 Corinthians 3:23
23 And ye are Christ's; and Christ is God's.
and Titus 2:14

14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.
The gospel is the answer to this first question.  I am a firm believer that the gospel is not just Christianity 101 but is to be cherished and wrote on the tablet of every believer in Jesus Christ heart. We should remind ourselves of it daily.  Remind others who we fellowship with and tell it to those who may have never heard it.  Kevin Deyoung is an author I like and in his book, The Good News we Almost Forgot, he had this to say of question 1 from the Heidelberg, “We live in a world where we expect to find comfort in possessions, pride, power and position.  But the Catechism teaches us that our only true comfort comes from the fact that we don’t even belong to ourselves.”  The catechism does not only teach this…the Bible does.  The gospel is so counter cultural…so opposed to pride. Some may say, “But I enjoy my stuff.”  That’s fine…enjoy it.  But don’t put your trust in it.  Some may say, “But I’ve done much for the church, I read my Bible, I help people out.”  To which I must reply, “Amen!  That’s wonderful!” BUT if you are looking for that to save you….THEN it’s just filthy rags.  Dung.  Dross and loss.  

Do you know what we bring to the table when it comes to our salvation?  
The need for it.  
The sin.  
That’s it.  
We will not stand at the throne of God and be able to say anything in our defense except, “I belong to Christ.  My savior paid my debt in full.”  But, this is JOY.  How astounding is that?  Deserving wrath, I get grace.  My responsibility is to repent (turn from my sin and turn to Christ in my trust) and believe (that Jesus Christ is exactly who claims to be).  Derrick Thomas another author who wrote one of my favorite books (Romans 8: How The Gospel Takes Us All the Way Home) said this,
“If we were depending on our feeble effort and resolve to keep our salvation than it’s over, the devil wins.  But it is NOT because our salvation, from beginning to end, is God’s work as ‘he who began a good work in us will bring it to completion.”  
What a joyous triumphant verse this is!  Philippians 1:6, “Being confident of this very thing, that he which hath begun a good work in you will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ”  How glorious! The Greek word for ‘confident’ in this verse is the strongest use of the verb…in other words it’s like Paul is saying he’s absolutely, 150%, without a doubt, positive, that Christ WILL complete the work that he began!  How can he be sure? Because HE IS NOT HIS OWN!  Believers belong to Christ! 
You see that’s the key.  We are sure not because of doctrine or our action or our effort.  We don’t have a relationship with those things.  Our relationship is with Christ.  Doctrine is to get to know HIM more deeply, our actions are to get know HIM and HIS ways more clearly, our effort is to get to know HIM more intimately.  Notice that the recurring theme is to KNOW HIM MORE.  Let this be our goal, our breath, our prayer, and our cry. On my epitaph I pray that it will be written, “He sought to know Christ deeper.” And then in my spirit in heaven let it be so.  
Christ is the point, brothers and sisters.  
He is the author of our faith. He is the finisher of our faith
Hebrews 12:2 looking unto Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith, who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God.
1 John 4:19 We love him, because he first loved us.
He is the sustainer of our faith (Philippians 1:6 “he will complete the work he began) because he is the OBJECT of our faith! 
We belong to him.  This is our comfort.  This is our trust and so mighty is our master that His will, will be done!
JI Packer said it this way:
“God’s love is a function of omnipotence and has at its heart an almighty purpose to bless that which cannot be thwarted.”  
His will, his Word, his hand…cannot be thwarted.  If Christ is for us who can be against us? (Romans 8:31)  This is why we can count it all loss because of the surpassing worth of Jesus Christ our Lord…because Christ owning us is infinitely better than owning ourselves.  This is JOY!  Christ!  This is why Paul could be beaten and stoned to the point where a whole town thinks he is dead and then goes back inside after he awakens to finish his sermon! This why martyrs sang as they were being burned! This is why no matter the struggle we cling to Christ because it didn’t begin with us it began with HIM.  We cling to the rock of ages because he is securely, yet tenderly caressing us. Every private struggle, prayer, pain, suffering, He is there perfecting you until the day when he says, “Well done thy good and faithful servant.”  Welcome home.    Keep that in mind and heart…those of you who reminisce on the past often.  Remember that your true ‘glory days’ are yet to come.
This brings us to the final part of the question, “What is your only comfort in life and DEATH?”  Death.  The great equalizer.  It comes to kings and paupers, strong and weak, mice and men, sick and healthy, young and old.  Most people live in fear of it, seeking cure after cure, spending all their money on a mad dash for re-generated youth.  But beloved, if you belong to Christ death is not something we fear.  Because our wonderful savior has overcame this dark shroud as well, by dying on the cross and then raising from the dead on the third day.  It has been well said, “What death did to Jesus is nothing compared to what Jesus did to death.”  Jesus Christ conquered death and we are more than conquerors through him that loves us (Romans 8:31). The Apostle Paul’s struggle was whether or not to go home and be with the Lord or stay to preach and help the Philippians and other brother and sisters.  In Philippians 1:21-25 he said,
21 For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain. 22 But if I live on in the flesh, this will mean fruit from my labor; yet what I shall choose I cannot tell. 23 For I am hard-pressed between the two, having a desire to depart and be with Christ, which is far better. 24 Nevertheless to remain in the flesh is more needful for you.” 
Why?  Why is to live Christ and die gain?  Because, we belong to him and in all we do…in life or death, he is our comfort…our trust.  And praise God for it.  Listen closely, He is not only there at the first cry of life and at our last death rattled gasp but he is there beyond.  And when that time comes (and his timing is perfect, like Him) he has a place prepared for you in heaven for eternity, forever and ever, in his actual tangible presence in glory (John 14:2-3).  Let me read to you from the last chapter of the Holy Bible.  Revelation 22: 1-4
22 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.
And there shall be no more curse: but the throne of God and of the Lamb shall be in it; and his servants shall serve him:
And they shall see his face; and his name shall be in their foreheads.
And there shall be no night there; and they need no candle, neither light of the sun; for the Lord God giveth them light: and they shall reign for ever and ever.
If you belong to Christ, He gave his life for you, his church, therefore; know that he will come back for you.  Death to us who are saved is bitter/sweet.  Sad for those we leave behind but beautiful for us.  Because we….are…going…home.
Let me touch on another aspect, in understanding all of this.   If God did all of this for you…all of grace, than who are we not to forgive and patiently love others.  Because of what Christ did for us, we are finally free to love others without expecting anything from them.  With only their interest and God’s glory in mind not our own recompense or needful desires.  Because our needs and desires are found in Christ and he took the and drank the cup of wrath we made for ourselves and gave us a sufficient overflowing cup of mercy that will follow us all the days of our lives and beyond. (Psalm 23:5-6)  So, who are we not to love everyone? And if you want an example let me tell you something a man named Sinclair Ferguson said that hit me between the eyes, “Jesus washed Judas’ feet, too.”  Our sovereign rulings Lord, creator of all the heavens and the Earth stooped down, cleaned, dried, and cared for the same feet that ran to betray him.  Think on that. If this were a Psalm now would be a good place to say, “Selah.”  We are told to bless those who use us and pray for those who harm us (Luke 6:28).  Saying ‘Amen’ to these thing is easy, now.  It’s when we are persecuted, suffering from sickness, hurt by loved ones, and tempted by Satan that at the forefront of our mind, solidified in the concrete of scripture, encased in our new heart that we must burn before us the blazing truth that, “Our only comfort in life and death is that we belong to Christ our Lord and savior.”  And what a well-placed, sweet trust it is. Everything we do should be filtered though this truth.  So, strong and secure is the hold our savior has on us that NOTHING can pry us from his safe, soft, strong, and loving arms.
 Romans 8:38-39:
38 For I am persuaded, that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor powers, nor things present, nor things to come,
39 Nor height, nor depth, nor any other creature, shall be able to separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord. 
Amazing grace, indeed.  How sweet the sound.
I want to now say that if you don’t know Christ, you have no comfort.  Only sinking sand.  You have no reason to sing Joy to the World because you have no joy.  Only temporary moments of fleeting happiness.  If you do not repent and believe in Christ than all you have ahead of you is the oncoming storm that is judgment and the just, fully deserved, consequence thereof.  But God, in his mercy, sent his son to be the sacrifice for sin.  I compel you and pray for you to seek the Lord. It is only as we go humbly in repentance and faith before the suffering instrument of death that is the cross of Christ that we can go boldly before the glorious, sovereign throne of the almighty God of all creation.  
This is how much He loved us, he became a man, lived the perfect life for us, suffered the wrath that we deserved, died the death that awaited us, and then stripped out death’s dreaded sting in bodily resurrection.  And not only is he here with us now in all we endure, but one day…he is coming back to bring us home forever.  WE THAT BELIEVE ARE HIS.  “Greater love hath no man, that a man lay down his life for his friends.” (John 15:13).  That is worth celebration.  So, this year, every time you say, “Merry Christmas.” Let your smile be ear to ear in anticipation for that day…the day we go home to our loving God and acknowledgment of what he did to get us there.

Saturday, October 19, 2013

Sinai Covenant: A Republication Of The Covenant Of Works? An Excerpt From The Marrow Of Modern Divinity

Chapter II, Section II, 3
The law, as the covenant of works, added to the promise.
 
Ant. But whether were the ten commandments, as they were delivered to them on Mount Sinai, the covenant of works or no?   Evan. They were delivered to them as the covenant of works. 1   Nom. But, by your favour, sir, you know that these people were the posterity of Abraham, and therefore under that covenant of grace which God made with their father; and therefore I do not think that they were delivered to them as the covenant of works; for you know the Lord never delivers the covenant of works to any that are under the covenant of grace . Evan.  Indeed it is true, the Lord did manifest so much love to the body of this nation, that all the natural seed of Abraham were externally, and by profession, under the covenant of grace made with their father Abraham; though, it is to be feared, many of them were still under the covenant of works made with their father Adam. 2   Nom. But, sir, you know, in the preface to the ten commandments, the Lord calls himself by the name of their God in general; and therefore it should seem that they were all of them the people of God. 3 Evan. That is nothing to the purpose; 4 for many wicked and ungodly men, being in the visible church, and under the external covenant, are called the chosen of God, and the people of God, though they be not so. In like manner were many of these Israelites called the people of God, though indeed they were not so.   Nom. But, sir, was the same covenant of works made with them that was made with Adam?   Evan. For the general substance of the duty, the law delivered on Mount Sinai, and formerly engraven on man's heart, was one and the same; so that at Mount Sinai the Lord delivered no new thing, only it came more gently to Adam before his fall, but after his fall came thunder with it.  Nom. Ay, sir, but as yourself said, the ten commandments, as they were written in Adam's heart, were but the matter of the covenant of works, and not the covenant itself, till the form was annexed to them, that is to say, till God and man were thereupon agreed: now, we do not find that God and these people did agree upon any such terms at Mount Sinai.    Evan. No; 5 say you so? do you not remember that the Lord consented and agreed, when he said, (Lev 18:5), "Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, which if a man do, he shall live in them"; and in Deuteronomy 27:26, when he said, "Cursed is he that confirmeth not all the words of this law, to do them?" And do you not remember that the people consented, (Exo 19:8), and agreed, when they said, "All that the Lord hath spoken we will do?" And doth not the apostle Paul give evidence that these words were the form of the covenant of works, when he says, (Rom 10:5), "Moses describeth that righteousness which is of the law, that the man that doeth these things shall live in them"; and when he says, (Gal 3:10), "For it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things written in the book of the law to do them?" 6 And in Deuteronomy 4:13, Moses, in express terms, calls it a covenant, saying, "And he declared unto you his covenant, which he commanded you to perform, even the ten commandments, and he wrote them upon tables of stone." Now, this was not the covenant of grace; for Moses afterwards, (Deut 5:3), speaking of this covenant, says, "God made not this covenant with your fathers, but with you"; and by "fathers" all the patriarchs unto Adam may be meant, [says Mr. Ainsworth,] who had the promise of the covenant of Christ. 7 Therefore, if it had been the covenant of grace, he would have said, God did make this covenant with them, rather than that he did not. 8   Nom. And do any of our godly and modern writers agree with you on this point?   Evan. Yes, indeed. Polonus says, "The covenant of works is that in which God promiseth everlasting life unto a man that in all respects performeth perfect obedience to the law of works, adding thereunto threatenings of eternal death, if he shall not perform perfect obedience thereto. God made this covenant in the beginning with the first man Adam, whilst he was in the first estate of integrity: the same covenant God did repeat and make again by Moses with the people of Israel." And Dr. Preston, on the New Covenant, [p. 317,] says, "The covenant of works runs in these terms, 'Do this and thou shalt live, and I will be thy God.' This was the covenant which was made with Adam, and the covenant that is expressed by Moses in the moral law." And Mr. Pemble [Vind. Fid. p. 152] says, "By the covenant of works, we understand what we call in one word 'the law,' namely, that means of bringing man to salvation, which is by perfect obedience unto the will of God. Hereof there are also two several administrations; the first is with Adam before his fall, when immortality and happiness were promised to man, and confirmed by an external symbol of the tree of life, upon condition that he continued obedient to God, as well in all other things, as in that particular commandment of not eating of the tree of knowledge of good and evil. The second administration of this covenant was the renewing thereof with the Israelites at Mount Sinai; where, after the light of nature began to grow darker, and corruption had in time worn out the characters of religion and virtue first grave in man's heart, 9 God revived the law by a compendious and full declaration of all duties required of man towards God or his neighbour, expressed in the decalogue; according to the tenor of which law God entered into covenant with the Israelites, promising to be their God in bestowing upon them all blessings of life and happiness, upon condition that they would be his people, obeying all things that he had commanded; which condition they accepted of, promising an absolute obedience, (Exo 19:8), 'all things which the Lord hath said we will do'; and also submitting themselves to all punishment in case they disobeyed, saying, 'Amen' to the curse of the law, 'Cursed be every one that confirmeth not all the words of the law: and all the people shall say, Amen.'" And Mr. Walker, on the Covenant, [p. 128,] says, that "the first part of the covenant, which God made with Israel at Horeb, was nothing else but a renewing of the old covenant of works, 10 which God made with Adam in paradise." And it is generally laid down by our divines, that we are by Christ delivered from the law as it is a covenant. 11  Nom. But, sir, were the children of Israel at this time better able to perform the condition of the covenant of works, than either Adam or any of the old patriarchs were, that God renewed it now with them, rather than before?   Evan. No, indeed; God did not renew it with them now, and not before, because they were better able to keep it, but because they had more need to be made acquainted what the covenant of works is, than those before. For though it is true the ten commandments, which were at first perfectly written in Adam's heart, were much obliterated 12 by his fall, yet some impressions and relics thereof still remained; 13 and Adam himself was very sensible of his fall, and the rest of the fathers were helped by tradition; 14 and, says Cameron, "God did speak to the patriarchs from heaven, yea, and he spake unto them by his angels"; 15 but now, by this time, sin had almost obliterated and defaced the impressions of the law written in their hearts; 16 and by their being so long in Egypt, they were so corrupted, that the instructions and ordinances of their fathers were almost worn out of mind; and their fall in Adam was almost forgotten, as the apostle testifies, (Rom 5:13,14), saying, "Before the time of the law, sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law." Nay, in that long course of time betwixt Adam and Moses, men had forgotten what was sin; so, although God had made a promise of blessing to Abraham, and to all his seed, that would plead interest in it, 17 yet these people at this time were proud and secure, and heedless of their estate; and though "sin was in them, and death reigned over them," yet they being without a law to evidence this sin and death unto their consciences, 18 they did not impute it unto themselves, they would not own it, nor charge themselves with it; and so, by consequence, found no need of pleading the promise made to Abraham; 19 (Rom 5:20), therefore, "the law entered," that Adam's offence and their own actual transgression might abound, so that now the Lord saw it needful, that there should be a new edition and publication of the covenant of works, the sooner to compel the elect unbelievers to come to Christ, the promised seed, and that the grace of God in Christ to the elect believers might appear the more exceeding glorious. So that you see the Lord's intention therein was, that they, by looking upon this covenant might be put in mind what was their duty of old, when they were in Adam's loins; yea, and what was their duty still, if they would stand to that covenant, and so go the old and natural way to work; yea, and hereby they were also to see what was their present infirmity in not doing their duty: 20 that so they seeing an impossibility of obtaining life by that way of works, first appointed in paradise, they might be humbled, and more heedfully mind the promise made to their father Abraham, and hasten to lay hold on the Messiah, or promised seed.   Nom. Then, sir, it seems that the Lord did not renew the covenant of works with them, to the intent that they should obtain eternal life by their yielding obedience to it?   Evan. No, indeed; God never made the covenant of works with any man since the fall, either with expectation that he should fulfil it, 21 or to give him life by it; for God never appoints any thing to an end, to the which it is utterly unsuitable and improper. Now the law, as it is the covenant of works, is become weak and unprofitable to the purpose of salvation; 22 and, therefore, God never appointed it to man, since the fall, to that end. And besides, it is manifest that the purpose of God, in the covenant made with Abraham, was to give life and salvation by grace and promise; and, therefore, his purpose in renewing the covenant of works, was not, neither could be, to give life and salvation by working; for then there would have been contradictions in the covenants, and instability in him that made them. Wherefore let no man imagine that God published the covenant of works on Mount Sinai, as though he had been mutable, and so changed his determination in that covenant made with Abraham; neither, yet let any man suppose, that God now in process of time had found out a better way for man's salvation than he knew before: for, as the covenant of grace made with Abraham had been needless, if the covenant of works made with Adam would have given him and his believing seed life; so, after the covenant of grace was once made, it was needless to renew the covenant of works, to the end that righteousness of life should be had by the observation of it. The which will yet more evidently appear, if we consider, that the apostle, speaking of the covenant of works as it was given on Mount Sinai, says, "It was added because of transgressions," (Gal 3:19). It was not set up as a solid rule of righteousness, as it was given to Adam in paradise, but was added or put to; 23 it was not set up as a thing in gross by itself.   Nom. Then, sir, it should seem that the covenant of works was added to the covenant of grace, to make it more complete.   Evan. O no! you are not so to understand the apostle, as though it were added by way of ingrediency as a part of the covenant of grace, as if that covenant had been incomplete without the covenant of works; for then the same covenant should have consisted of contradictory materials, and so it should have overthrown itself; for, says the apostle, "If it be by grace, then it is no more of works; otherwise grace is no more grace: but if it be of works, then it is no more of grace; otherwise work is no more work," (Rom 11:6). But it was added by way of subserviency and attendance, the better to advance and make effectual the covenant of grace; so that although the same covenant that was made with Adam was renewed on Mount Sinai, yet I say still, it was not for the same purpose. For this was it that God aimed at, in making the covenant of works with man in innocency, to have that which was his due from man: 24 but God made it with the Israelites for no other end, than that man, being thereby convinced of his weakness, might flee to Christ. So that it was renewed only to help forward and introduce another and a better covenant; and so to be a manuduction unto Christ, viz: to discover sin, to waken the conscience, and to convince them of their own impotency, and so drive them out of themselves to Christ. Know it then, I beseech you, that all this while there was no other way of life given, either in whole, or in part, than the covenant of grace. All this while God did but pursue the design of his own grace; and, therefore, was there no inconsistency either in God's will or acts; only such was his mercy, that he subordinated the covenant of works, and made it subservient to the covenant of grace, and so to tend to evangelical purposes.   Nom. But yet, sir, methinks it is somewhat strange that the Lord should put them upon doing the law, and also promise them life for doing, and yet never intend it.   Evan. Though he did so, yet did he neither require of them that which was unjust, nor yet dissemble with them in the promise; for the Lord may justly require perfect obedience at all men's hands, by virtue of that covenant which was made with them in Adam; and if any man could yield perfect obedience to the law, both in doing and suffering, he should have eternal life; for we may not deny [says Calvin] but that the reward of eternal salvation belongeth to the upright obedience of the law. 25 But God knew well enough that the Israelites were never able to yield such an obedience: and yet he saw it meet to propound eternal life to them upon these terms; that so he might speak to them in their own humour, as indeed it was meet: for they swelled with mad assurance in themselves, saying, "All that the Lord commandeth we will do," and be obedient, (Exo 19:8). Well, said the Lord, if you will needs be doing, why here is a law to be kept; and if you can fully observe the righteousness of it, you shall be saved: sending them of purpose to the law, to awaken and convince them, to sentence and humble them, and to make them see their own folly in seeking for life that way; in short, to make them see the terms under which they stood, that so they might be brought out of themselves, and expect nothing from the law, in relation to life, but all from Christ. For how should a man see his need of life by Christ, if he do not first see that he is fallen from the way of life? and how should he understand how far he had strayed from the way of life, unless he do first find what is that way of life? Therefore it was needful that the Lord should deal with them after such a manner to drive them out of themselves, and from all confidence in the works of the law; that so, by faith in Christ, they might obtain righteousness and life. And just so did our Saviour also deal with that young expounder of the law, (Matt 19:16), who it seems, was sick of the same disease: "Good Master," says he, "what shall I do that I may inherit eternal life?" He doth not, says Calvin, simply ask, which way or by what means he should come to eternal life, but what good he should do to get it; whereby it appears, that he was a proud justiciary, one that swelled in fleshly opinion that he could keep the law, and be saved by it; therefore he is worthily sent to the law to work himself weary, and to see need to come to Christ for rest. And thus you see that the Lord, to the former promises made to the fathers, added a fiery law; which he gave from Mount Sinai, in thundering and lightning, and with a terrible voice, to the stubborn and stiff-necked Israel; whereby to break and tame them, and to make them sigh and long for the promised Redeemer.
[
  Footnotes:

[[1] As to this point, there are different sentiments among orthodox divines; though all of them do agree, that the way of salvation was the same under the Old and New Testament, and that the Sinai covenant, whatever it was, carried no prejudice to the promise made unto Abraham, and the way of salvation therein revealed, but served to lead men to Jesus Christ. Our author is far from being singular in this decision of this question. I adduce only the testimonies of three late learned writers, "That God made such a covenant [viz: the covenant of works] with our first parents, is confirmed by several parts of Scripture," (Hosea 6:7, Gal 4:24),—Willison's Sacr. Cat. p. 3. The words of the text last quoted are these: "For these are the two covenants, the one from the Mount Sinai which gendereth to bondage." Hence it appears, that in the judgment of this author, the covenant from Mount Sinai was the covenant of works, otherwise there is no shadow of reason from this text for what it is adduced to prove. The Rev. Messrs. Flint and M'Claren, in their elaborate and seasonable treatise against Professor Simpson's doctrine, [for which I make no question but their names will be in honour with posterity] speak to the same purpose. The former having adduced the fore-cited text, (Gal 4:24), says, Jam duo federa, & c., that is, "Now here are two covenants mentioned, the first the legal one, by sin rendered ineffectual, entered into with Adam, and now again promulgate." [Exam. Doctr. Joh. Simp. p. 125.] And afterwards, speaking of the law of works, he adds, Atque hoc est illud fadus, &c., that is, "And this is that covenant promulgate on Mount Sinai, which is called one of the covenants," (Gal 4:24). Ibid. p. 131. The words of the latter, speaking of the covenant of works are these, "Yea, it is expressly called a covenant," (Hosea 6, Gal 4). And Mr. Gillespie proves strongly, that Galations 4 is understood of the covenant of works and grace. See his Ark of the Testament, part 1. chap. 5. p. 180. The New Scheme Examined, p. 176. The delivering of the ten commandments on Mount Sinai as the covenant of works, necessarily includes in it the delivering of them as a perfect rule of righteousness; forasmuch as that covenant did always contain in it such a rule, the true knowledge of which the Israelites were at that time in great want of, as our author afterwards teaches.

 [2] The strength of the objection in the preceding paragraph lies here, namely, that at this rate, the same person, at one and the same time, were both under the covenant of works, and under the covenant of grace, which is absurd. Ans. The unbelieving Israelites were under the covenant of grace made with their father Abraham externally and by profession, in respect of their visible church state; but under the covenant of works made with their father Adam internally and really, in respect of the state of their souls before the Lord. Herein there is no absurdity; for to this day many in the visible church are thus, in these different respects, under both covenants. Farther, as to believers among them, they were internally and really, as well as externally, under the covenant of grace; and only externally under the covenant of works, and that, not as a covenant co-ordinate with, but subordinate and subservient unto, the covenant of grace: and in this there is no more inconsistency than in the former. 

[3] As delivered from the covenant of works, by virtue of the covenant of grace.

 [4] That will not, indeed, prove them all to have been the people of God in the sense before given, for the reason here adduced by our author. Howbeit, the preface to the ten commandments deserves a particular notice in the matter of the Sinai transaction, (Exo 20:2), "I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage." Hence it is evident to me, that the covenant of grace was delivered to the Israelites on Mount Sinai. For the Son of God, the messenger of the covenant of grace, spoke these words to a select people, the natural seed of Abraham, typical of his whole spiritual seed. He avoucheth himself to be their God; namely, in virtue of the promise, or covenant made with Abraham, (Gen 17:7), "I will establish my covenant—to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee": and their God, which brought them out of the land of Egypt; according to the promise made to Abraham at the most solemn renewal of the covenant with him.—(Gen 15:14), "Afterwards shall they come out with great substance. And he first declares himself their God, and then requires obedience, according to the manner of the covenant with Abraham, (Gen 17:1); "I am the Almighty God, [i.e. in the language of the covenant, The Almighty God TO THEE, to make THEE for ever blest through the promised SEED,] walk thou before me, and be thou perfect." But that the covenant of works was also, for special ends, repeated and delivered to the Israelites on Mount Sinai, I cannot refuse, 1. Because of the apostle's testimony, (Gal 4:24), "These are the two covenants; the one from Mount Sinai, which gendereth to bondage." For the children of this Sinai covenant the apostle here treats of, are excluded from the eternal inheritance, as Ishmael was from Canaan, the type of it, (verse 30), "Cast out the bond-woman and her son; for the son of the bond-woman shall not be heir with the son of the free woman"; but this could never be said of the children of the covenant of grace under any dispensation, though both the law and covenant from Sinai itself, and its children, were even before the coming of Christ under a sentence of exclusion, to be executed on them respectively in due time. 2. The nature of the covenant of works is most expressly in the New Testament brought in, propounded, and explained from the Mosaical dispensation. The commands of it from Exodus 20 by our blessed Saviour, (Matt 19:17-19), "If thou wilt enter into life keep the commandments. He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, thou shalt not commit adultery," &c. The promise of it, (Rom 10:5), "Moses describes the righteousness which is of the law, that the man which doth these things shall live by them." The commands and promise of it together, see Luke 10:25-28. The terrible sanction of it, Galations 3:10. For it is written [viz: Deuteronomy 27:26,] "Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them." 3. To this may be added the opposition betwixt the law and grace, so frequently inculcated in the New Testament, especially in Paul's epistles. See one text for all, (Gal 3:12), "And the law is not of faith, but the man that doeth them shall live in them." 4. The law from Mount Sinai was a covenant, (Gal 4:24), "These are the two covenants, the one from the Mount Sinai"; and such a covenant as had a semblance of disannulling the covenant of grace, (Gal 3:17), "The covenant that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law which was 430 years after, cannot disannul"; yea, such an one as did, in its own nature, bear a method of obtaining the inheritance, so far different from that of the promise, that it was inconsistent with it; "For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise," (Gal 3:18), wherefore the covenant of the law from Mount Sinai could not be the covenant of grace, unless one will make this last not only a covenant seeming to destroy itself, but really inconsistent: but it was the covenant of works, which indeed had such a semblance, and in its own nature did bear such a method as before noted; howbeit, as Ainsworth says, "The covenant of the law now given could not disannul the covenant of grace," (Gal 3:17). Annot. on Exodus 19:1 Wherefore I conceive the two covenants to have been both delivered on Mount Sinai to the Israelites. First, The covenant of grace made with Abraham, contained in the preface, repeated and promulgate there unto Israel, to be believed and embraced by faith, that they might be saved; to which were annexed the ten commandments, given by the Mediator Christ, the head of the covenant, as a rule of life to his covenant people. Secondly, the covenant of works made with Adam, contained in the same ten commands, delivered with thunderings and lightnings, the meaning of which was afterwards cleared by Moses, describing the righteousness of the law and sanction thereof, repeated and promulgate to the Israelites there, as the original perfect rule of righteousness, to be obeyed; and yet were they no more bound hereby to seek righteousness by the law than the young man was by our Saviour's saying to him, (Matt 19:17,18), "If thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments—Thou shalt do no murder," &c. The latter was a repetition of the former. Thus there is no confounding of the two covenants of grace and works; but the latter was added to the former as subservient unto it, to turn their eyes towards the promise, or covenant of grace: "God gave it to Abraham by promise. Wherefore then serveth the law? it was added, because of transgressions, till the Seed should come," (Gal 3:18,19). So it was unto the promise given to Abraham, that this subservient covenant was added; and that promise we have found in the preface to the ten commands. To it, then was the subservient covenant, according to the apostle, added, put, or set to, as the word properly signifies. So it was no part of the covenant of grace, the which was entire to the fathers, before the time that was set to it; and yet is, to the New Testament church, after that is taken away from it: for, says the apostle, "It was added till the seed should come." Hence it appears that the covenant of grace was, both in itself, and in God's intention, the principal part of the Sinai transaction: nevertheless, the covenant of works was the most conspicuous part of it, and lay most open to the view of the people. According to this account of the Sinai transaction, the ten commands, there delivered, must come under a twofold notion or consideration; namely, as the law of Christ, and as the law of works: and this is not strange, if it is considered, that they were twice written on tables of stone, by the Lord himself,—the first tables the work of God, (Exo 32:16), which were broken in pieces, (verse 19), called the tables of the covenant, (Deut 9:11,15)—the second tables, the work of Moses, the typical Mediator, (Exo 34:1), deposited at first [it would seem] in the tabernacle mentioned, (33:7), afterward, at the rearing of the tabernacle with all its furniture, laid up in the ark within the tabernacle, (25:16); and whether or not, some such thing is intimated, by the double accentuation of the decalogue, let the learned determine; but to the ocular inspection it is evident, that the preface to the ten commands, (Exo 20:2, Deut 5:6), stands in the original, both as a part of a sentence joined to the first commands, and also as an entire sentence, separated from it, and shut up by itself. Upon the whole, one may compare with this the first promulgation of the covenant of grace, by the messenger of the covenant in paradise, (Gen 3:15), and the flaming sword placed there by the same hand, "turning every way to keep the way of the tree of life." 

[5] Here, there is a large addition in the ninth edition of this book, London, 1699. It well deserves a place, and is as follows: "I do not say, God made the covenant of works with them, that they might obtain life and salvation thereby; no, the law was become weak through the flesh, as to any such purpose, (Rom 8:3). But he repeated, or gave a new edition of the law, and that, as a covenant of works, for their humbling and conviction; and so do his ministers preach the law to unconverted sinners still, that they who 'desire to be under the law may hear what the law says,' (Gal 4:21). And as to what you say of their not agreeing to this covenant, I pray take notice, that the covenant of works was made with Adam, not for himself only, but as he was a public person representing all his posterity, and so that covenant was made with the whole nature of man in him, as appears by Adam's sin and curse coming upon all, (Rom 5:12, Gal 3:10). Hence all men are born under that covenant, whether they agree to it or no; though, indeed, there is by nature such a proneness in all to desire to be under that covenant, and to work for life, that if natural men's consent were asked, they would readily [though ignorantly] take upon them to do all that the Lord requireth; for do you not remember," &c.

 [6] That the conditional promise, (Lev 18:5), [to which agrees Exodus 19:8,] and the dreadful threatening, (Deut 27:26), were both given to the Israelites, as well as the ten commands, is beyond question; and that according to the apostle, (Rom 10:5, Gal 3:10), they were the form of the covenant of works, is as evident as the repeating of the words, and expounding them so, can make it. How, then, one can refuse the covenant of works to have been given to the Israelites, I cannot see. Mark the Westminster Confession upon the head of the covenant of works; "The first covenant made with man was a covenant of works, wherein life was promised to Adam, and in him to his posterity, upon condition of perfect and personal obedience." And this account of the being and nature of that covenant is there proved from these very texts among others, Romans 10:5, Galatians 3:10, chap. 7, art. 2.

 [7] "But the covenant of the law [adds he] came after, as the apostle observeth, (Gen 3:17).—They had a greater benefit than their fathers; for though the law could not give them life, yet it was a schoolmaster unto, i.e., to bring them unto, Christ." (Gal 3:21-24). Ainsworth on Deuteronomy 5:3. 

[8] The transaction at Sinai or Horeb [for they are but one mountain] was a mixed dispensation; there was the promise or covenant of grace, and also the law; the one a covenant to be believed, the other a covenant to be done, and thus the apostle states, the difference betwixt these two, (Gal 3:12), "And the law is not of faith, but the man that DOETH them shall live in them." As to the former, viz: the covenant to be believed, it was given to their fathers as well as to them. Of the latter, viz: the covenant to be done, Moses speaks expressly, (Deut 4:12,13), "The Lord spake unto you out of the midst of the fire, and he declared unto you his covenant, which he commanded you to PERFORM [or DO] even ten commandments." And (5:3), he tells the people no less expressly, that "the Lord made not THIS COVENANT with their fathers."

[9] That is, had worn them out, in the same measure and degree as the light of nature was darkened; but neither the one nor the other was ever fully done. (Rom 2:14,15).

 [10] Wherein I differ from this learned author as to this point, and for what reasons, may be seen earlier [footnote #4].

 [11] But not as it is a rule of life, which is the other member of that distinction.

[12] Both in the heart of Adam himself, and of his descendants in the first ages of the world. [Back]

[13] Both with him and them.

 [14] The doctrine of the fall, with whatsoever other doctrine was necessary to salvation, was handed down from Adam, the fathers communicating the same to their children and children's children. There were but eleven patriarchs before the flood; 1. Adam, 2. Seth, 3. Enos, 4. Cainan, 5. Mahalaleel, 6. Jared, 7. Enoch, 8, Methuselah, 9. Lamech, 10. Noah, 11. Shem. Adam having lived 930 years, (Gen 5:5), was known to Lamech, Noah's father, with whom he lived 66 years, and much longer with the rest of the fathers before him; so that Lamech, and those before him, might have the doctrine from Adam's own mouth. Methuselah lived with Adam 243 years, and with Shem 98 years before the deluge. See Genesis 5. And what Shem, who, after the deluge, lived 502 years, (Gen 11:10,11), had learned from Methuselah, he had occasion to teach Arphaxad, Salah, Eber, Peleg, Reu, Serug, Nahor, Terah, Abraham, Isaac, (Gen 21:5,), and Jacob, to whose 51st year he [viz: Shem] reached. Genesis 11:10, and 21:5, and 25:26, compared. [Vid. Bail. Op. Hist. Chron. p. 2, 3.] Thus one may perceive, how the nature of the law and covenant of works given to Adam, might be far better known to them, than to the Israelites after their long bondage in Egypt. 

[15] That is, and besides all this, God spake to the patriarchs immediately and by angels. But neither of these do we find during the time of the bondage in Egypt, until the angel of the Lord appeared to Moses in the bush, and ordered him to go and bring the people out of Egypt, (Exo 3).

 [16] The remaining impressions of the law on the hearts of the Israelites.

 [17] By faith; believing, embracing, and appropriating it to themselves, (Heb 11:13, Jer 3:4). [Back]

[18] Inasmuch as the remaining impressions of the law on their hearts were so weak, that they were not sufficient for the purpose.

 [19] By faith proposing it as their only defence, and opposing it to the demands of the law or covenant of works, as their only plea.

 [20] How far they came short of, and could not reach unto the obedience they owed unto God, according to the perfection of the holy law.

[21] Nor before the fall neither, properly speaking; but the expression is agreeable to Scripture style, (Isa 5:4), "Wherefore when I looked it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wild grapes?"

[22] (Rom 8:3), "For what the law could not DO, in that it was weak through the flesh; God sending his own Son," &c.

 [23] It was not set up by itself as an entire rule of righteousness, to which alone they were to look who desired righteousness and salvation, as it was in the case of upright Adam, "For no man, since the fall, can attain to righteousness and life by the moral law," Lar. Cat. quest. 94. But it was added to the covenant of grace, that by looking at it men might see what kind of righteousness it is by which they can be justified in the sight of God; and that by means thereof, finding themselves destitute of that righteousness, they might be moved to embrace the covenant of grace, in which that righteousness is held forth to be received by faith.

 [24] This was the end of the work, namely, of making the covenant of works with Adam, but not of the repeating of it at Sinai; it was also the end or design of the worker, namely of God, who made that covenant with Adam, to have his due from man, and he got it from the Man Christ Jesus.

[25] That is, the perfect
obedience of the law; as it is said, (Eccl 7:29), "God made man upright."


Saturday, August 24, 2013

Am I really a Christian? Answering Eight Doubts


A Simplified and Abridged Selection from Thomas Boston’s Human Nature In Its Fourfold State Simplified and edited by Jeffrey T. Riddle

Copyright 2013 Jeffrey T. Riddle

Note: Though it would certainly be unkind to give false assurance of salvation to someone who has not been truly converted, it would be equally cruel to withhold comfort and assurance to a weak lamb who suffers with despair over his spiritual state. In his spiritual classic “Human Nature In Its Fourfold State,” the Scottish minister Thomas Boston (1676-1732) lists eight “cases” where a true Christian might have spiritual doubts about the authenticity of his faith. Such doubts, Boston notes, “may hinder some persons from the comfortable view of their happy state.” Thus, he writes to encourage, comfort, and assure those saints who are burdened with such doubts.

True Christians sometimes have serious doubts. Here are eight different kinds of doubts they
sometimes have:

First Doubt: I doubt I am really born again, because I do not know the exact time of my conversion.Neither can I trace the steps that led me to becoming a Christian.

Answer: Though it is desirable to be able to describe the beginning of the Lord’s work in your life and the gradual growth you’ve enjoyed, this is not always necessary to prove that you truly are a Christian. We must remember that the work of the Holy Spirit is a mystery. In the Gospel of John, we read about Jesus healing a blind man. This man simply said, “One thing I know, that whereas I was blind, now I see” (John 9:25). When we see a flame, we know there is a fire, even if we don’t know how it began. Even so, we can know we are Christians, even if we do not know how or when it all happened. Has there been a change in your soul? Does your mind have light? Do you want to obey God in everything for the sake of Jesus who died on the
cross? If you answer “yes” to such questions, then you do not need to trouble yourself with this doubt

Second Doubt: If I am really a Christian, a new creature in Christ, why do I continue to sruggle with sin?

Answer: We certainly do not want to lay down pillows, so that hypocrites can rest easy with indulging their sin and making God’s grace a slave to their lusts. On the other hand, we need to remember that “the just man falleth seven times a day” (Proverbs 24:16). Sin may prevail at times even over the children of God. Are you groaning under the weight of sin and the corruption of your nature? Are you disgusted with yourself for the sins of your heart and life? Are you striving to put your lusts to death, fleeing daily to the blood of Christ for pardon and looking to his Spirit for sanctification? Though you might say with Psalm 65:3, “Iniquities prevail against me,” remember that this verse ends, “As for transgressions, thou shalt purge them away.”The new creature in Christ is like a man who does not live in a house alone. An ill tempered neighbor lives in the same house with him. His name is “remaining corruption.” These two constantly struggle with each other for control: “The flesh lusteth against the spirit, and the spirit against the flesh” (Galatians 5:17). Sometimes old “corruption” prevails and makes the child of God a captive to the law of sin (Romans 7:23). Do not let his occasional victories make you conclude that you are not a child of God! Instead, let it humble you. Let it make you more watchful. Let it make you thirst even more intensely for Jesus Christ, His blood and Spirit. This attitude will become a principle of grace in you which seeks the destruction of the very sin that
so often defeats you.

Third Doubt: I find that my heart has been in more turmoil after I became a Christian than it was before. Is this consistent with someone who is supposed to have been changed by Christ?

Answer: There are indeed dreadful cases of persons who appear to have become Christians, but who later renounce the faith and fall into gross and open immorality. It seems that the devil returns to their hearts with seven spirits worse than himself (cf. Matthew 12:45). Such persons are in a dangerous spiritual state. They risk sinning against the Holy Spirit. They must repent, before it is too late. This is not necessarily the case, however, with you. Corruption can be stirred up in a Christian even more strongly than it was before he became a Christian. It might appear to you that all the forces of hell have been raised to try to recapture you as an escape fugitive. Such stirrings may indeed occur in those truly changed by Christ. When restraining grace comes up against the corruption in a new believer, it is no wonder that it tries to fight back, “warring against the law of the mind” (Romans 7:23).

Sin will resist all the harder when it knows this new principle is seeking to cast it out. When the sun shines through a window we see all the dust in the house 16 that we did not see before. So when the light of grace shines in our lives, we see the corruption inside us that we had not noticed before. Sin is not quite dead in the believer’s soul. It is dying a lingering death. It is being crucified. No wonder it begins to fight so hard. It knows it is about to die, so it struggles to live. Besides all this, the Christian might be faced with more and stronger temptations after his conversion. Satan has to work harder to try to bring back one who has escaped than he does to guard one who is still a captive. The author of Hebrews says, “After ye were illuminated, ye endured a great fight of afflictions” (Hebrews 10:32). He then adds, “cast not away your confidence” (v. 35). Remember that God’s grace is sufficient for you, and the God of peace shall bruise Satan under your feet shortly. Remember how Pharaoh and the Egyptians had the Israelites cornered at the Red Sea, but then God intervened and overthrew them (Exodus 14). Do not let this doubt destroy the foundation of your trust. Empty yourself. Be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might, and you will be victorious.

Fourth Doubt: I sometimes feel that my love for the things of this world is greater than my love for God. How then can I call him Father? Indeed, it sometimes seems that the affections I used to feel for God are gone. I fear that all the love I ever had for the Lord has only been like a fit and a flash. I fear I am a hypocrite.

Answer: It cannot be denied that an overriding love of the world is a certain mark of an unsaved man. “If any man love the world, the love of the Father is not in him (1 John 2:15b).Still, the most active affections are not always the strongest. A little brook sometimes makes more noise than a mighty river. The strength of our affections can only be measured by the firmness and steadfastness of the root. Suppose a person meets with a friend who has been out of the country. He has not seen this friend for a long time. His affections for that friend might, in the moment, be stronger than his feelings for his own wife and children. Would we conclude that he loves his friend more than them?

Surely not! Even so, though a Christian might in the moment be moved with love for something in this world, this does not mean that he loves it more than God. Love to God is always more firmly rooted in a believer’s heart than is any worldly enjoyment. If there is ever a competition between love for God and love for the world, one of the loves will win. Do you want to understand your spiritual state? Look into your own heart and lay the two loves in the balance. See which outweighs the other. Ask yourself in the sight of God whether you would part with Christ for the sake of anyone or anything in the world. If you honestly answer that at this command you would cast away what is dearest to you in the world for Christ, then you have no reason to think you love the world more than God. On the other hand,  if you love someone or something in the world more than God, then you are not a believer.

Consider the following two texts: “He that loveth father or mother more than me, is not worthy of me” (Matt 10:37).
“If any man come to me, and hate not his father and mother—he cannot be my disciple” (Luke 14:26).
From these texts, we can infer that one who is ready to part even with his father and mother for the Lord’s sake loves them less than Him. In addition, consider that there are two types of love for Christ: First, there is an emotional love for Him. It is like a dart in the heart. It creates a holy lovesickness in the soul. It longs to njoy the beloved. It is like the longing described in Song of  Songs 5:8: “I charge you, O daughters of erusalem, if ye find my beloved, that ye tell him that I am sick of love.” Or it refers to a fullness of love, as in Song of Songs 2:5: “Stay with me flagons, comfort me with apples; for I am sick of love.” Such strong eelings are usually found in young converts who “sing in the day of their youth” (Hosea 2:15). They are sometimes so on fire for the Lord that they are even ready to criticize godly persons who have long been
believers just because they do not share the same strong feelings. They mistakenly think that there is far less religion in the world than there actually is.

When the froth settles below the brim in his own cup, such a man finds in himself the same things he once criticized in others. This should humble him. It should make him know his daily need for the blood of Christ for forgiveness and for the Spirit of Christ for sanctification. So he grows downward in humiliation, self-loathing, and self-denial. Second, there is a rational love for Christ. This love is shown by a serious concern for God’s authority and his commands. When one has this love, he wants to please God by obeying him even if he does not feel strong emotions. “For this is the love of God, that we keep his commandments” (1 John 5:3). The emotional love for God does not always continue with you. If you lack it you have no need to consider yourself a hypocrite as long as you maintain a rational love for Christ. A faithful and loving wife has no need to question her love for her husband just because she does not have the same emotional experience of love for him as when they first married.

Fifth Doubt: Every time I begin to think I can see the marks of grace in me and that I am truly saved, I hear about some hypocrite or apostate, and I am shaken. Fear comes over me like a storm. Am I like this kind of person?

Answer: These sorts of things ought to stir us up. We ought to examine ourselves seriously and impartially. Still, we should not always be in a state of suspense about our spiritual state. You can see the outside of a hypocrite. You can see his “spiritual” activity and emotions, but you cannot see inside him. You do not know his heart.You can only form a judgment of another person based on what you see on the outside. You would do well to judge others with charity. Again, you cannot know the secret springs of their actions. Rather than judging others, you ought to look at your own heart. You are the only person you can judge with certainty. You must look at yourself as no one else in the world can do. You can see things in yourself that you simply cannot see in others.

A hypocrite’s religion may seem far greater than the religion of a sincere believer. Remember that what is great in the eyes of men is often of little value in God’s sight. I would rather groan with Paul (Rom 8:6) than shed false tears with Esau, prophesy with Balaam, or have the temporary joy of the shallow-ground hearers. There is a fire that will judge every man’s work to see “what sort it is” (1 Cor 3:13). If God does not judge by outward appearance, why do you? Without special revelation, you cannot know the sincerity of another man’s faith. But you can know the sincerity of your own faith, without any special revelation. This is why Peter exhorted the saints “to give diligence to make your calling and election sure” (2 Peter 1:10). Therefore, the actions of hypocrites and apostates should not disturb you. The important thing is seriously examining your own spiritual condition.

Here are two ways that the weakest saints excel the “best” hypocrites: First, the saints deny themselves. They renounce all confidence in themselves and their works. They venture their souls completely on God’s plan of salvation through Christ. They are “poor in spirit” (Matt 5:3). They are blessed, because they are not offended by Christ (Matt 11:6). In Philippians 3:3, Paul wrote, “We are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.” Second, the saints have a real hatred of sin. They are willing to part with every lust, without exception, and to obey all the Lord’s commands. “Then shall I not be ashamed, when I have respect unto all thy commandments” (Psalm 119:6). Test yourself by these standards.

Sixth Doubt: My life falls so far short of the standards of the great saints of the Bible and of the excellent Christians that I personally know. When I look at them, I can hardly stand to look at myself in comparison. How can I claim even to be in the same family with such saints?

Answer: We can indeed see a measure of grace and holiness in this life that we should have but cannot ever reach. This should humble us. It should also make us press all the more vigorously toward the mark. The devil wants weak Christians to be tortured by comparing themselves to strong Christians. To give in to this temptation would be like a child doubting his relationship to his father, because he is not the same height as his older brother. It is irrational! There are saints of various sizes in Christ’s family. Some are fathers; some are young men; and some are little children (1 John 2:13-14).

Seventh Doubt: I have never read in the Bible or known about a true child of God who was as tempted or as without God as I am. Since I do not know of any Christian who has ever been in my condition, I can only conclude that I must not be a believer.

Answer: This doubt comes from ignorance both of the Bible and of the actual experience of Christians. Those who have this doubt should try speaking with a mature Christian friend or a godly minister. Doing this has brought peace to some when they realize that their case is not exceptional and that many Christians have had the same struggle.

The Bible provides many examples of Christians suffering with horrible temptations. The devil tempted Job to blaspheme (Job 1:11; 2:9). Asaph was tempted to think religion was vain and to throw it off (Psalm 73:13). Christ himself was tempted to “cast himself down from a pinnacle of the temple” and “to worship the devil” (Matt 4:6-9). Many Christians have not only been attacked with temptations, but they have even been overcome by them and fallen into gross sin for a time. Peter denied Christ, and cursed and swore that he did not know him (Mark 14:71). Some Christians were compelled to blaspheme under persecution by Paul, before he was converted (Acts 26:10-11).

Many Christians can bear witness to their own sad personal experiences in this area. They have suffered very great temptations which have astonished their spirits, made their bodies tremble, and made them sick to their stomachs. Satan’s fiery darts can cause great damage. It takes great diligence to extinguish them or to block them with the shield of faith (Eph 6:16). Sometimes Satan throws so many fire-balls at our house that all we can do is constantly run back and forth to extinguish them. We must remember, however, that it is not a sin merely to be tempted. It is sin only when we consent to the temptation. If one is tempted to sin but does not consent to the temptation, he can no more be accused of that sin than a chaste man can be charged with fathering a child out of wedlock. Suppose you go to a mature Christian friend or minister and share your problem, but they say they have never known anyone exactly in your condition. You still should not think that your case is exceptional. You certainly should not give up hope! Even a mature Christian or godly minister cannot know every difficulty a child of God might face.

Some have had struggles 20 known only to God and their own consciences. Though Scripture provides directions for every condition a believer might be in, it does not exhaustively list every struggle a Christian might face. Though you cannot find your specific case in the Bible, bring your case to the Bible, and you will find a remedy. Do not worry with trying to find out if anyone has ever been in your condition. Strive instead to apply Christ to your condition. Christ has a remedy for all diseases. Even if you found a true Christian who was tempted in the same way you are what would that prove? Your situations would not be exactly the same in every way.

Consider the human face. In some ways, every human face is the same. Each has the same features. At the same time, every face is also different and can be distinguished from all others. Conclusion: If you see the marks of Biblical regeneration in your life, you should conclude that you are in the state of grace. This is true even if you are struggling with temptations that are unique to you (which, by the way, is not very likely).

Eighth Doubt: The struggles I have are strange or unusual. I doubt that a child of God has ever faced the kind of providential trials I have faced.

Answer: Much of what was previously said (see Doubt Seven) applies here also. Holy Job was assaulted with this temptation (see Job 5:1), but he rejected it and held fast. The apostle Peter says that Christians may be tempted “to think it strange concerning the fiery trial” (1 Peter 4:12). Sometimes we travel on paths where we can see the footprints of neither man nor beast. We cannot conclude from this, however, that no one has ever gone this way before us. Though you cannot see the footsteps of the flock in the way of your affliction, you must not conclude that you are the first to ever walk that road. But what if you were the first to walk that way?

Some saint or other must be first in drinking from each bitter cup. Who are we to question the rovidential circumstances God has given us? “Thy way is in the sea, and thy paths in great waters; and thy footsteps are not known” (Psalm 77:19). If the Lord should carry you to heaven by some remote road, so to speak, you would have no reason to complain. We must learn to allow proper latitude for God’s sovereignty. Do your duty. Do not let any difficulty you face hide from you the fact that you are in a state of grace. As Solomon said, “no man knoweth either love or hatred by all that is before them” (Ecclesiastes 9:1). Ω

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

R.C Sproul Quotes: Legalism and Manipulation of Conscience


“Perhaps the most deadly and widespread form of legalism is that type which adds legislation to the law of God and treats the addition as if it were divine law. The Old Testament prophets expressed God’s fury at this form of behavior, lamenting the result of “binding men where God had left them free.” It is a manifestation of man’s fallenness to impose his own sense of propriety on other people, seeking mass conformity to his own preferences and adding insult to it by declaring these prejudices and preferences to be nothing less than the will of God. A frequent point of conflict between Jesus and the Pharisees centered on the Pharisees’ traditions, which imposed hardships on the people who were bound by these man-made obligations. Jesus rebuked the Pharisees because they had elevated their traditions to the level of the law of God, seeking not only to usurp God’s authority, but to oppress mankind.



“The elevation of human preferences to the level of divine mandate is not limited to an isolated group of moralistic Pharisees in the first century. The problem has beset the church throughout its history. Not only do traditions develop that are added to the law of God, but in many cases they become the supreme tests of the faith, the litmus test by which people are judged to be either Christians or non-Christians. It is unthinkable in the New Testament that a person’s Christian commitment would ever be determined by whether or not that person engaged in dancing, or in wearing of lipstick and the like. Unfortunately, so often when these preferences become tests of faith, they involve not only the elevation of nonbiblical mandates to the level of the will of God, but they represent the trivialization of righteousness. When these externals are elevated to the level of being measuring rods of righteousness, we begin to major in minors and obscure the real tests of righteousness.” R.C. Sproul, Following Christ, (Wheaton, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., 1991), pp. 323-325.

“The manipulation of conscience can be a destructive force within the Christian community. Legalists are often masters of guilt manipulation, while antinomians master the art of quiet denial. The conscience is a delicate instrument that must be respected. One who seeks to influence the conscience of others carries a heavy responsibility to maintain the integrity of the other person’s own personality as crafted by God. When we impose false guilt on others we paralyze our neighbors, binding them in chains where God has left them free. When we urge false innocence we contribute to their delinquency, exposing them to the judgment of God.” R.C. Sproul, Following Christ, (Wheaton, Illinois: Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. 1991), p.390.